Carl Zeiss 000000-2096-517

Carl Zeiss 000000-2096-517

Carl Zeiss
35 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sigma 207975

Sigma 207975

Sigma
85 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Carl Zeiss
27
Sigma
86
Street
Carl Zeiss
38
Sigma
86
Macro
Carl Zeiss
15
Sigma
82
Portrait
Carl Zeiss
51
Sigma
81
Travel
Carl Zeiss
18
Sigma
80
Budget
Carl Zeiss
40
Sigma
75
Video Cinema
Carl Zeiss
33
Sigma
74
Landscape
Carl Zeiss
16
Sigma
71
Wildlife Sports
Carl Zeiss
27
Sigma
66

Spezifikationen

Carl Zeiss 000000-2096-517Sigma 207975
Optics
Typewide-angle-zoom
Focal Length Min18 mm10 mm
Focal Length Max18 mm18 mm
Elements13
Groups10
Aspherical Elements1
ED Elements4
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades7
Build
MountSony E
FormatAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.72 kg0.26 kg
Filter Thread67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance117 mm
Max Magnification1:4

Vor- & Nachteile

Carl Zeiss 000000-2096-517

  • Strong aperture (67th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (65th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average build (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Sigma 207975

  • Strong macro (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong aperture (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong optical (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average social proof (30th percentile)

Preise

Sigma 207975 is 157 £ cheaper (1.2x less).

Carl Zeiss 000000-2096-5170.043Score pro Dollar
vs
Sigma 2079750.133Score pro Dollar

Sigma 207975 bietet 3.1x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Carl Zeiss 000000-2096-517

Fazit

Gewinner: Sigma 207975

Scores 85 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.

Sigma 207975 Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen