Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sigma Contemporary 35mm F2 DG 35mm

Sigma Contemporary 35mm F2 DG 35mm

Sigma
62 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Nikon
89
Sigma
68
Macro
Nikon
88
Sigma
69
Budget
Nikon
85
Sigma
55
Street
Nikon
84
Sigma
61
Portrait
Nikon
84
Sigma
74
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Sigma
63
Landscape
Nikon
79
Sigma
51
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Sigma
48
Travel
Nikon
70
Sigma
37

Spezifikationen

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Sigma Contemporary 35mm F2 DG 35mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min17 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm35 mm
Elements1310
Groups119
Aspherical Elements33
ED Elements3★1
CoatingMulti-CoatedSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/2
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon ZL-Mount
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.45 kg★0.95 kg
Filter Thread67 mm58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★Autofocus
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★270 mm
Max Magnification1:5.261:5.56

Vor- & Nachteile

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Sigma Contemporary 35mm F2 DG 35mm

  • Strong bokeh (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong aperture (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong macro (76th percentile)
  • Strong optical (74th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (7th percentile)7th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports