Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0
Sigma
73 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM
Canon
84 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Budget
Street
Professional
Portrait
Video Cinema
Travel
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Macro
Spezifikationen
| Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0 | Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 135 mm | 55 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 135 mm | 250 mm |
| Elements | 13 | 15 |
| Groups | 10 | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 0★ |
| ED Elements | 4★ | 1 |
| Coating | wasserabweisende Beschichtung, antistatisches Glas | Super Spectra coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/1.4 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | f/1.8 | 4-5.6 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Canon EF-S |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Weight | 0.09 kg★ | 0.38 kg |
| Filter Thread | 105 mm | 58 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Hyper Sonic AF Motor | STM★ |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 4 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 875 mm | 850 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.29x★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong bokeh (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong aperture (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Below average social proof (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM
- Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong versatility (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average macro (34th percentile)
Preise
Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B00.457Score pro Dollar
vs
Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM0.266Score pro Dollar
Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0 bietet 1.7x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0
Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM
Fazit
Gewinner: Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM
Scores 84 overall, wins 4 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.
