GoPro HB-Series AEWAL-001

GoPro HB-Series AEWAL-001

GoPro
82 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6

Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6

Canon
36 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Street
GoPro
88
Canon
32
Portrait
GoPro
85
Canon
18
Budget
GoPro
77
Canon
45
Video Cinema
GoPro
74
Canon
26
Professional
GoPro
71
Canon
26
Travel
GoPro
70
Canon
43
Wildlife Sports
GoPro
68
Canon
37
Landscape
GoPro
57
Canon
38
Macro
GoPro
48
Canon
26

Spezifikationen

GoPro HB-Series AEWAL-001Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6
Optics
Typewide-angletelephoto
Focal Length Min—75 mm
Focal Length Max—300 mm
Coatinghydrophobic lens coatingSuper Spectra Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/032-45★
Min Aperturef/04-5.6
Constant—✗
Diaphragm Blades—7★
Build
MountGoPro HERO Black MountCanon RF
Format—full-frame★
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.10 kg★0.45 kg
Filter Thread—58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Type—DC
Stabilization✓★✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance—1.49 m★
Max Magnification—0.25x★

Vor- & Nachteile

GoPro HB-Series AEWAL-001

  • Strong bokeh (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong aperture (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6

  • Strong versatility (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average macro (30th percentile)

Preise

GoPro HB-Series AEWAL-001 is 117 £ cheaper (2.3x less).

GoPro HB-Series AEWAL-0010.894Score pro Dollar
vs
Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.60.170Score pro Dollar

GoPro HB-Series AEWAL-001 bietet 5.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

GoPro HB-Series AEWAL-001

Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6

Fazit

★ Gewinner: GoPro HB-Series AEWAL-001

Scores 82 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 17 specs.

GoPro HB-Series AEWAL-001 Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen