AILKIN

AILKIN

AILKIN
30 Gesamtbewertung
vs
TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
84 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Gaming
AILKIN
35
TOZO
80
Budget
AILKIN
31
TOZO
80
Travel
AILKIN
29
TOZO
78
Fitness
AILKIN
17
TOZO
72
Calls
AILKIN
33
TOZO
70
Commute
AILKIN
30
TOZO
70
Music
AILKIN
39
TOZO
68

Spezifikationen

AILKINTOZO Crystal Pods
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wireless
Ear TipsS, M, LMedium
Weight0.04 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size13 mm10 mm
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsUSB C Headphones for iPhone 17 16 15 Pro Max Plus Air iPad Pro, USB-C in-Ear Buds with Micrphone & Noise Cancelling USBC Apple Wired Earbuds Headphones, Type C Earphones for Galaxy S26 S25 S24 PixelLDAC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.4
Multipoint
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life7 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast Charging10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery35 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count4
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantSiriOther
Touch Controls
AppTOZO App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX5

Vor- & Nachteile

AILKIN

  • Strong sound (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong anc (75th percentile)
  • Strong mic (72nd percentile)
  • Below average comfort (29th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (32nd percentile)

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 84 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 15 of 35 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods Besser bei:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness