HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP
96 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Dell QBT1250

Dell QBT1250

Dell
69 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Gaming
HP
91
Dell
15
Creator
HP
87
Dell
28
Developer
HP
87
Dell
63
Home Office
HP
87
Dell
73
Business
HP
87
Dell
79
Workstation
HP
86
Dell
67
Ai Llm
HP
67
Dell
26
Compact
HP
30
Dell
50

Spezifikationen

HP OMEN GT16-0364Dell QBT1250
Processor
CPU*AMD Ryzen 7 8700FIntel Core Ultra 5 235★
CPU Multi-Core Score
30,931
38,151
Cores814★
Frequency4.1 GHz★3.4 GHz
L3 Cache16 MB24 MB★
Graphics
GPU*NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070★Intel Graphics
GPU Benchmark Score
28,703
3,170
Typediscreteintegrated★
VRAM12 GB★—
VRAM TypeGDDR7—
Memory & Storage
RAM32 GB★16 GB
RAM GenerationDDR5DDR5
Storage 11 TB1 TB
Storage 1 TypeSSDNVMe SSD★
Build
Form Factormid-towerworkstation
PSU850W★—
Weight14.50 kg—
Connectivity
USB-C Ports22
USB Ports8★—
Thunderbolt0—
HDMI1 x HDMI—
DisplayPort3 x DisplayPort3x DisplayPort
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6★—
BluetoothBluetooth 5.3★—
EthernetGigabit EthernetGigabit Ethernet
System
OSWindows 11 HomeWindows 11 Pro

Vor- & Nachteile

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong port selection (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong ram (88th percentile)88th %ile

Dell QBT1250

  • Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong cpu (78th percentile)
  • Strong storage (74th percentile)
  • Strong reliability (70th percentile)

Fazit

★ Gewinner: HP OMEN GT16-0364

Scores 96 overall, wins 7 of 8 usage categories and 9 of 26 specs.

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Besser bei:

Ai LlmGamingCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation

Dell QBT1250 Besser bei:

Compact