MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
MICRO CENTER
65 Gesamtbewertung
vs
AMD AD9800AHABBOX
AMD
37 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Productivity
Efficiency
Gaming
Budget
Ai Llm
Server
Spezifikationen
| MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF | AMD AD9800AHABBOX | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | — | AMD |
| Series | — | AMD A Series |
| Model | — | A12-9800E |
| Codename | — | Bristol Ridge |
| Class | — | desktop |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | — | 4★ |
| Base Clock | Keine Daten | |
| Boost Clock | Keine Daten | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | — | 2★ |
| L3 Cache | — | 2★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | — | AM4 |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | — | Radeon R7 Graphics |
Vor- & Nachteile
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
- Strong single thread (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong multi thread (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong ai (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong efficiency (66th percentile)
- Below average affordability (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average platform (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average feature (20th percentile)20th %ile
AMD AD9800AHABBOX
- Strong user sentiment (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong feature (70th percentile)
- Below average platform (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average efficiency (23rd percentile)
- Below average ai (27th percentile)
- Below average multi thread (30th percentile)
Preise
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF0.056Score pro Dollar
vs
AMD AD9800AHABBOX0.205Score pro Dollar
AMD AD9800AHABBOX bietet 3.7x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
Scores 65 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 2 of 14 specs.
