Thermal Grizzly 000 AM5
Thermal Grizzly
13 Gesamtbewertung
vs
AMD FX 9590 8-core AM3+
AMD
48 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Productivity
Budget
Gaming
Ai Llm
Server
Efficiency
Spezifikationen
| Thermal Grizzly 000 | AMD FX 9590 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | AMD | AMD |
| Series | — | FX |
| Model | 000 | FX-9590 |
| Codename | — | Vishera |
| Class | desktop | desktop |
| Process | — | 32★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | — | 8★ |
| P-cores | — | 8★ |
| Threads | — | 8★ |
| Base Clock | Keine Daten | |
| Boost Clock | Keine Daten | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | — | 8★ |
| L3 Cache | — | 8★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | Keine Daten | |
| PassMark Single | Keine Daten | |
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | — | DDR3★ |
| Max Speed | Keine Daten | |
| ECC | — | ✓★ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | AM5 | AM3+ |
| TDP | — | 220★ |
| Unlocked | — | ✓★ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | — | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Vor- & Nachteile
Thermal Grizzly 000 AM5
- Strong affordability (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Below average single thread (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average ai (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average multi thread (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average efficiency (4th percentile)4th %ile
AMD FX 9590 8-core AM3+
- Strong feature (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong social proof (73rd percentile)
- Below average affordability (28th percentile)
- Below average efficiency (31st percentile)
Preise
Thermal Grizzly 000 AM50.621Score pro Dollar
vs
AMD FX 9590 8-core AM3+0.136Score pro Dollar
Thermal Grizzly 000 AM5 bietet 4.6x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: AMD FX 9590
Scores 48 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 15 of 22 specs.
