MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM5

MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM5

MSI
16 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Intel Core i9 X-Series 9900X 10-core LGA 2066

Intel Core i9 X-Series 9900X 10-core LGA 2066

Intel
65 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Productivity
MSI
15
Intel
69
Budget
MSI
18
Intel
65
Ai Llm
MSI
14
Intel
61
Gaming
MSI
14
Intel
59
Server
MSI
15
Intel
56
Efficiency
MSI
11
Intel
55

Spezifikationen

MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFiIntel Core i9 X-Series 9900X
Processor
BrandAMDIntel
SeriesRyzen 9Core i9
Model90009900X
Codename—Skylake X
Classdesktopdesktop
Process—14★
Cores & Clocks
Cores—10★
P-cores—10★
Threads—20★
Base ClockKeine Daten
3,500
Boost ClockKeine Daten
4,400
Cache
L2 Cache—10★
L3 Cache—19.25★
Performance
PassMark MultiKeine Daten
21,554
PassMark SingleKeine Daten
2,527
Memory
Memory TypeDDR5★DDR4
Max Speed
8,400
2,666
Channels24★
Max Memory
256
Keine Daten
ECC—✗
Platform & Power
SocketAM5LGA 2066
PCIe5.03.0
PCIe Lanes—44★
TDP—165★
Unlocked—✓★

Vor- & Nachteile

MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM5

  • Strong platform (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average single thread (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average ai (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average multi thread (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average efficiency (4th percentile)4th %ile

Intel Core i9 X-Series 9900X 10-core LGA 2066

  • Strong platform (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong ai (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong multi thread (78th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (78th percentile)

Preise

Both products are similarly priced.

MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM50.049Score pro Dollar
vs
Intel Core i9 X-Series 9900X 10-core LGA 20660.217Score pro Dollar

Intel Core i9 X-Series 9900X 10-core LGA 2066 bietet 4.4x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM5

Intel Core i9 X-Series 9900X 10-core LGA 2066

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Intel Core i9 X-Series 9900X

Scores 65 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 14 of 25 specs.

Intel Core i9 X-Series 9900X Besser bei:

Ai LlmBudgetGamingServerEfficiencyProductivity

Auch in Betracht ziehen