AMD EPYC 7532 32-core EPYC ROME

AMD EPYC 7532 32-core EPYC ROME

AMD
40 Gesamtbewertung
vs
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

MICRO CENTER
66 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Productivity
AMD
43
MICRO CENTER
74
Efficiency
AMD
14
MICRO CENTER
65
Gaming
AMD
23
MICRO CENTER
61
Budget
AMD
22
MICRO CENTER
59
Ai Llm
AMD
46
MICRO CENTER
56
Server
AMD
44
MICRO CENTER
54

Spezifikationen

AMD EPYC 7532MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
Processor
BrandAMD—
SeriesEPYC—
Model7532—
CodenameRome—
Classserver—
Cores & Clocks
Cores32★—
Base Clock
2,400
Keine Daten
Boost Clock
3,300
Keine Daten
Cache
L3 Cache
256
Keine Daten
Performance
PassMark MultiKeine Daten
70,111
PassMark SingleKeine Daten
4,737
Memory
Memory TypeDDR4★—
Max Speed
3,200
Keine Daten
Channels8★—
Platform & Power
SocketEPYC ROME—
PCIe4.0—
PCIe Lanes
128
Keine Daten
TDP200★—

Vor- & Nachteile

AMD EPYC 7532 32-core EPYC ROME

  • Strong platform (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (77th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average affordability (26th percentile)
  • Below average efficiency (26th percentile)

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

  • Strong single thread (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong multi thread (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong ai (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong efficiency (67th percentile)
  • Below average affordability (6th percentile)6th %ile
  • Below average platform (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average feature (21st percentile)

Preise

AMD EPYC 7532 32-core EPYC ROME is 839 £ cheaper (3.6x less).

AMD EPYC 7532 32-core EPYC ROME0.120Score pro Dollar
vs
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF0.057Score pro Dollar

AMD EPYC 7532 32-core EPYC ROME bietet 2.1x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

AMD EPYC 7532 32-core EPYC ROME

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

Fazit

★ Gewinner: MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

Scores 66 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 2 of 18 specs.

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF Besser bei:

Ai LlmBudgetGamingServerEfficiencyProductivity

Auch in Betracht ziehen