Team Group MP44Q 2TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Team Group MP44Q 2TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Team Group
77 综合评分
vs
Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Seagate
91 综合评分

买家怎么说

Team Group MP44Q 2TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

85 满分 100 置信度中 10 条评价

用户普遍称赞TeamGroup MP44Q具有出色的性价比、可靠的性能和简单的安装。一位买家指出,当安装在主板的M.2插槽中时,速度略低于宣传的最大值,但仍然认为它很快。总体而言,推荐用于预算构建和游戏驱动器。

优点
  • 物超所值
  • 性能快速
  • 安装简单
  • 品牌可靠
  • 适合游戏
缺点
  • 速度低于宣传最大值
  • 无法从PCIe插槽启动
  • 附带散热器足够但不出色
👍 Value for money 5
👍 Performance 6
👍 Ease of installation 3
👍 Reliability 3
🤔 Speed consistency 2
🤔 Thermal management 2

Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

85 满分 100 置信度低 5 条评价

这款SSD因其卓越的耐用性和高耐久性而备受赞誉,5年质保和救援服务让人安心。用户强调其超快的顺序读写速度,非常适合游戏和繁重工作负载。支持DirectStorage是现代游戏配置的一个加分项。然而,一些人指出并非所有电脑都能保证兼容,建议检查系统要求。

优点
  • 5年质保
  • 包含救援服务
  • 高耐久性(5,050TBW)
  • 快速顺序读写
  • 支持DirectStorage
缺点
  • 兼容性不保证
  • 可能不适合所有电脑
👍 Durability 1
👍 Warranty 1
👍 Performance 1
👎 Compatibility 1
👍 Directstorage support 1

评分

Laptop
Team Group
66
Seagate
91
Gaming
Team Group
67
Seagate
86
Console
Team Group
72
Seagate
84
Workstation
Team Group
60
Seagate
83
Budget
Team Group
77
Seagate
73
Portable
Team Group
20
Seagate
24

规格

Team Group MP44QSeagate FireCuda 530R
Drive
Capacity
2,000
4,000
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation44
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
7,400
7,400
Sequential Write (MB/s)
6,500
6,800
Random Read (IOPS)无数据
1,300,000
Random Write (IOPS)无数据
1,300,000
Hardware
NANDQLCTLC★
DRAM Cache✗✗
Controller—E18
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
10,000
5,050
MTBF (hours)
1,600,000
1,800,000
Warranty (years)55
Features
Heatsink✓★✗

优缺点

Team Group MP44Q 2TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong endurance (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong speed (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong capacity (78th percentile)
  • Below average affordability (33rd percentile)
  • Below average feature (33rd percentile)

Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong endurance (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong speed (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Below average affordability (7th percentile)7th %ile

结论

★ 胜出: Seagate FireCuda 530R

Scores 91 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 6 of 17 specs.

Team Group MP44Q 更擅长:

Budget

Seagate FireCuda 530R 更擅长:

GamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation