Samsung 970 EVO 500GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Samsung 970 EVO 500GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Samsung
69 综合评分
vs
Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Seagate
91 综合评分

买家怎么说

Samsung 970 EVO 500GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

72 满分 100 置信度低 8 条评价

三星EVO 970 NVMe因其极快的速度、快速的启动时间和可靠的性能而备受赞誉,成为游戏和日常使用的热门选择。然而,多位用户报告了将其用作启动盘时的问题、保修支持不佳以及缺少安装硬件,这降低了整体满意度。

优点
  • 极快的速度
  • 快速启动
  • 可靠的性能
  • 适合游戏
  • 值得信赖的品牌
缺点
  • 无法用作启动盘
  • 保修未兑现
  • 缺少安装硬件
  • 包装简陋
👍 Performance 6
👎 Boot drive compatibility 2
👎 Warranty support 1
👎 Mounting hardware 2
👎 Packaging 2
👍 Value for money 2

Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

85 满分 100 置信度低 5 条评价

这款SSD因其卓越的耐用性和高耐久性而备受赞誉,5年质保和救援服务让人安心。用户强调其超快的顺序读写速度,非常适合游戏和繁重工作负载。支持DirectStorage是现代游戏配置的一个加分项。然而,一些人指出并非所有电脑都能保证兼容,建议检查系统要求。

优点
  • 5年质保
  • 包含救援服务
  • 高耐久性(5,050TBW)
  • 快速顺序读写
  • 支持DirectStorage
缺点
  • 兼容性不保证
  • 可能不适合所有电脑
👍 Durability 1
👍 Warranty 1
👍 Performance 1
👎 Compatibility 1
👍 Directstorage support 1

评分

Laptop
Samsung
72
Seagate
90
Gaming
Samsung
57
Seagate
86
Console
Samsung
28
Seagate
83
Workstation
Samsung
71
Seagate
83
Budget
Samsung
66
Seagate
73
Portable
Samsung
17
Seagate
24

规格

Samsung 970 EVOSeagate FireCuda 530R
Drive
Capacity
500
4,000
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation34★
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
3,400
7,400
Sequential Write (MB/s)
2,300
6,800
Random Read (IOPS)
370,000
1,300,000
Random Write (IOPS)
450,000
1,300,000
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✓★✗
ControllerSamsung PhoenixE18
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
300
5,050
MTBF (hours)
1,500,000
1,800,000
Warranty (years)55
Features
Heatsink✗✗
Hardware Encryption✓★—

优缺点

Samsung 970 EVO 500GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong feature (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong endurance (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong random (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average affordability (22nd percentile)
  • Below average capacity (27th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (29th percentile)

Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong endurance (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong speed (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Below average affordability (7th percentile)7th %ile

结论

★ 胜出: Seagate FireCuda 530R

Scores 91 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 8 of 18 specs.

Seagate FireCuda 530R 更擅长:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation