ADATA Legend 860

ADATA Legend 860

ADATA
66 综合评分
vs
Western Digital WD Black SN850X

Western Digital WD Black SN850X

Western Digital
99 综合评分

买家怎么说

ADATA Legend 860

暂无用户反馈

Western Digital WD Black SN850X

92 满分 100 置信度中 17 条评价

WD_BLACK SN850X 因其卓越的速度和可靠性而备受赞誉,常与三星和Solidigm等竞争对手进行有利比较。用户强调其性价比,尤其是在促销时,以及其适用于游戏和高性能任务。对潜在问题的担忧通过固件更新得到缓解,并确认该硬盘在PS5和Windows 11上运行良好。

优点
  • 极速性能
  • 可靠表现
  • 物超所值
  • PS5安装简便
  • 兼容Windows 11
缺点
  • 潜在固件问题
  • 4TB版本双面
  • 高强度使用可能需要散热器
👍 Speed 6
👍 Reliability 5
👍 Value for money 3
👍 Ps5 compatibility 3
👎 Firmware concerns 2
👍 Windows 11 boot 1

评分

Budget
ADATA
64
Western Digital
98
Workstation
ADATA
64
Western Digital
94
Gaming
ADATA
62
Western Digital
93
Console
ADATA
64
Western Digital
93
Laptop
ADATA
57
Western Digital
84
Portable
ADATA
17
Western Digital
25

规格

ADATA Legend 860Western Digital WD Black SN850X
Drive
Capacity
1,000
2,000
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation44
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
6,000
7,300
Sequential Write (MB/s)
5,000
6,600
Random Read (IOPS)无数据
1,200,000
Random Write (IOPS)无数据
1,100,000
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗✓★
ControllerSMI SM2264—
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
640
1,200
MTBF (hours)
2,000,000
1,750,000
Warranty (years)35★
Features
Heatsink✓✓
Hardware Encryption✓✓

优缺点

ADATA Legend 860

  • Strong feature (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong endurance (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong speed (77th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (12th percentile)12th %ile

Western Digital WD Black SN850X

  • Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong feature (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong random (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (95th percentile)95th %ile

价格

ADATA Legend 860

No current pricing available

Western Digital WD Black SN850X

结论

★ 胜出: Western Digital WD Black SN850X

Scores 99 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 8 of 18 specs.

Western Digital WD Black SN850X 更擅长:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation

也值得考虑