Lexar NS100 128GB SATA III 2.5"

Lexar NS100 128GB SATA III 2.5"

Lexar
28 综合评分
vs
Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Seagate
91 综合评分

买家怎么说

Lexar NS100 128GB SATA III 2.5"

68 满分 100 置信度低 5 条评价

用户普遍认为这款SSD是预算有限时的好选择,尤其是对于旧机器上的网页浏览和游戏等基本任务。然而,一位用户报告了在NAS中的早期故障,另一位用户指出缺乏DRAM缓存可能导致缓存填满时速度变慢。总体而言,它被认为是物有所值,速度和客户服务方面获得好评。

优点
  • 物有所值
  • 启动速度快
  • 适合基本任务
  • 客户服务体验良好
缺点
  • NAS中早期故障
  • 无DRAM缓存
  • 缓存填满时速度变慢
👍 Value for money 3
🤔 Reliability 2
👍 Performance 2
👎 Dram cache 2
👍 Customer service 1

Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

85 满分 100 置信度低 5 条评价

这款SSD因其卓越的耐用性和高耐久性而备受赞誉,5年质保和救援服务让人安心。用户强调其超快的顺序读写速度,非常适合游戏和繁重工作负载。支持DirectStorage是现代游戏配置的一个加分项。然而,一些人指出并非所有电脑都能保证兼容,建议检查系统要求。

优点
  • 5年质保
  • 包含救援服务
  • 高耐久性(5,050TBW)
  • 快速顺序读写
  • 支持DirectStorage
缺点
  • 兼容性不保证
  • 可能不适合所有电脑
👍 Durability 1
👍 Warranty 1
👍 Performance 1
👎 Compatibility 1
👍 Directstorage support 1

评分

Laptop
Lexar
22
Seagate
91
Gaming
Lexar
18
Seagate
86
Console
Lexar
8
Seagate
84
Workstation
Lexar
29
Seagate
83
Budget
Lexar
61
Seagate
73
Portable
Lexar
7
Seagate
24

规格

Lexar NS100Seagate FireCuda 530R
Drive
Capacity
128
4,000
Form Factor2.5"M.2 2280
InterfaceSATA IIIPCIe 4.0 x4
ProtocolSATANVMe
PCIe Generation—4★
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
550
7,400
Sequential Write (MB/s)无数据
6,800
Random Read (IOPS)无数据
1,300,000
Random Write (IOPS)无数据
1,300,000
Hardware
NAND—TLC★
DRAM Cache—✗
Controller—E18
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
64
5,050
MTBF (hours)无数据
1,800,000
Warranty (years)35★
Features
Heatsink—✗

优缺点

Lexar NS100 128GB SATA III 2.5"

  • Strong affordability (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong social proof (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong endurance (66th percentile)
  • Below average capacity (7th percentile)7th %ile
  • Below average feature (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average speed (20th percentile)20th %ile

Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong endurance (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong speed (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Below average affordability (7th percentile)7th %ile

结论

★ 胜出: Seagate FireCuda 530R

Scores 91 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 17 specs.

Seagate FireCuda 530R 更擅长:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation