Samsung 9100 PRO 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
Team Group T-FORCE CARDEA A440 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
买家怎么说
Samsung 9100 PRO 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
三星9100 Pro因其极快的速度而广受好评,尤其是在数据传输和大文件加载方面,多位用户指出它明显比990 Pro更快。然而,一位经过验证的买家在两周内经历了驱动器完全故障,这是一个重大问题。大多数评论者推荐用于高端配置,但建议购买带散热片的版本或优质的第三方散热器。
优点
- 极快的速度
- 明显比990 Pro快
- 数据传输表现出色
- 优质产品
- 推荐用于高端配置
缺点
- 数周内可能出现驱动器故障
- 需要散热片才能获得最佳性能
- 日常任务中速度差异不明显
Team Group T-FORCE CARDEA A440 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
Team Group T-FORCE CARDEA A440 SSD 因其极快的速度和可靠性而备受赞誉,用户指出它达到了宣传的 7000 MB/s 读取速度,并能轻松处理游戏和视频编辑等要求苛刻的任务。大多数评论者对其性价比非常满意,称其物超所值。然而,一位经过验证的买家报告称,该硬盘仅使用一个半月后就坏了,这对长期可靠性来说是一个重大担忧。总体而言,情绪非常积极,但这一单一故障以及对石墨烯散热片和价格的小抱怨阻止了完美评分。
优点
- 极快的速度
- 出色的性价比
- 游戏和编辑可靠
- 达到宣传的7000 MB/s
- 物有所值
缺点
- 一个硬盘在1.5个月后坏了
- 石墨烯散热片粘贴不牢
- 价格偏高
评分
规格
| Samsung 9100 PRO | Team Group T-FORCE CARDEA A440 | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Protocol | NVMe | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 5★ | 4 |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Random Read (IOPS) | ||
| Random Write (IOPS) | ||
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | TLC★ | — |
| DRAM Cache | ✓ | ✓ |
| Controller | In-House Controller | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | ||
| MTBF (hours) | ||
| Warranty (years) | 5★ | 3 |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | ✓ | ✓ |
| Hardware Encryption | ✓★ | — |
优缺点
Samsung 9100 PRO 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong random (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong feature (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Below average affordability (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average user sentiment (29th percentile)
Team Group T-FORCE CARDEA A440 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong random (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong endurance (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong speed (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Below average affordability (15th percentile)15th %ile
结论
Scores 98 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 18 specs.