SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
SanDisk
89 综合评分
vs
Kingston NV3 500GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
Kingston
58 综合评分
买家怎么说
SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
暂无用户反馈
Kingston NV3 500GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
78 满分 100 置信度中 18 条评价
Kingston NV3 SSD 在易安装性、速度和日常使用可靠性方面普遍获得积极反馈。然而，多位用户指出价格大幅上涨，使其不如以前划算。一些问答回复强调它没有 DRAM，在持续写入时可能会变慢，但被认为足以满足典型的桌面和游戏使用。
优点
- 安装简便
- 性能快速
- 日常使用可靠
- 正常价格下性价比高
- 适合作为系统盘
缺点
- 价格大幅上涨
- 无DRAM（使用HMB）
- 持续写入时速度下降
- 500GB容量可能有限
Price fluctuation 3
Ease of installation 4
Performance 5
Reliability 4
Dram less design 3
Capacity limitations 3
评分
Budget
Console
Workstation
Gaming
Laptop
Portable
规格
| SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 | Kingston NV3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Protocol | NVMe | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 5★ | 4 |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Random Read (IOPS) | 无数据 | |
| Random Write (IOPS) | 无数据 | |
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | TLC★ | — |
| DRAM Cache | ✗ | ✗ |
| Controller | nCache 4.0 | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | ||
| MTBF (hours) | ||
| Warranty (years) | 5★ | 3 |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Hardware Encryption | ✓★ | — |
优缺点
SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong feature (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Below average affordability (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
Kingston NV3 500GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong social proof (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong affordability (76th percentile)
- Strong speed (70th percentile)
- Strong endurance (70th percentile)
- Below average feature (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average capacity (27th percentile)
结论
胜出: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100
Scores 89 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 11 of 18 specs.