Samsung 850 EVO 1TB SATA III 2.5"
Samsung
58 综合评分
vs
Crucial T500 2TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
Crucial
95 综合评分
买家怎么说
Samsung 850 EVO 1TB SATA III 2.5"
78 满分 100 置信度中 18 条评价
三星850 EVO固态硬盘总体评价良好，用户称赞其速度、可靠性和安装简便。然而，一位已验证买家报告在1.5年后出现崩溃，另一位则认为其令人失望。缺少USB线或安装支架等配件是常见的小抱怨。
优点
- 快速启动和读取
- 性能可靠
- 安装简便
- 轻巧设计
- 物有所值
缺点
- 不含USB线
- 不含安装支架
- 1.5年后可能崩溃
- 轻塑料感
- 过时的实用软件
Speed 6
Reliability 5
Installation 4
Accessories 4
Value for money 3
Build quality 2
Crucial T500 2TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
88 满分 100 置信度中 15 条评价
Crucial T500 2TB SSD因其快速性能和高性价比而备受赞誉，用户指出它可与更昂贵的驱动器相媲美。安装简单，但有些人提到缺少螺丝以及紧凑型设备中散热器的潜在适配问题。一些用户在克隆后遇到了轻微的软件问题，但总体满意度仍然很高。
优点
- 快速读写速度
- 性价比高
- 安装简单
- 品牌可靠
- 大存储容量
缺点
- 不含螺丝
- 散热器可能存在的适配问题
- 克隆后出现软件问题
Performance 5
Value for money 3
Installation 4
Reliability 2
Compatibility 2
Accessories 2
评分
Gaming
Workstation
Console
Budget
Laptop
Portable
规格
| Samsung 850 EVO | Crucial T500 | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | 2.5" | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | SATA III | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Protocol | SATA | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | — | 4★ |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Random Read (IOPS) | ||
| Random Write (IOPS) | ||
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | TLC | TLC |
| DRAM Cache | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Controller | Samsung MGX Controller | Phison E25 |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | 无数据 | |
| MTBF (hours) | 无数据 | |
| Warranty (years) | 5 | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | — | ✓★ |
| Hardware Encryption | ✓ | ✓ |
优缺点
Samsung 850 EVO 1TB SATA III 2.5"
- Strong social proof (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong feature (79th percentile)
- Strong endurance (65th percentile)
- Below average affordability (21st percentile)
- Below average speed (31st percentile)
Crucial T500 2TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong feature (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong random (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong speed (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Below average affordability (20th percentile)20th %ile
结论
胜出: Crucial T500
Scores 95 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 18 specs.