QCY H3 ANC
QCY
88 综合评分
vs
Sennheiser HD 560S
Sennheiser
62 综合评分
买家怎么说
QCY H3 ANC
88 满分 100 置信度中 13 条评价
QCY H3 ANC蓝牙耳机因其出色的降噪、舒适性和电池续航而备受好评。用户赞赏音质和性价比，尽管有些人注意到重量和锋利边缘的问题。总体而言，它们以具有竞争力的价格推荐其功能和性能。
优点
- 出色的降噪效果
- 全天佩戴舒适
- 电池续航出色
- 音质良好
- 性价比高
缺点
- 耳罩边缘锋利
- 重量较重
- 高音量时漏音
- 弯腰时滑动
Noise cancellation 8
Comfort 7
Battery life 6
Sound quality 6
Value for money 5
Build quality 4
Sennheiser HD 560S
85 满分 100 置信度低 5 条评价
森海塞尔HD 560S因其卓越的清晰度、舒适度和约200美元的出色性价比而广受好评。用户称赞其温暖的低音、细腻的中高频以及轻量开放式设计，长时间使用也不易疲劳。少数人指出塑料外壳质感不够高级，高音有时会刺耳，还有一位买家遇到了插头间歇性杂音和声道不平衡的问题。总体而言，对于追求高保真游戏和音乐体验的用户来说，尤其是搭配DAC/耳放时，这是一款超值之选。
优点
- 卓越的清晰度和细节
- 温暖而不喧宾夺主的低音
- 长时间佩戴极其舒适
- 轻量开放式设计
- 约200美元的超高性价比
缺点
- 塑料外壳质感不够高级
- 高音有时刺耳
- 部分产品存在间歇性杂音和声道不平衡
- 需要耳放才能达到最佳音量
- 开放式设计导致漏音
Sound quality 5
Comfort 5
Build quality 4
Value for money 4
Bass performance 3
Gaming performance 3
评分
Budget
Gaming
Commute
Work
Studio
Music
Calls
规格
| QCY H3 ANC | Sennheiser HD 560S | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | open |
| Foldable | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Weight | 0.26 kg | 0.24 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | synthetic protein leather, memory foam | Velour |
| Headband | self-adjustable and flexible headband | lightweight frame |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 40 mm★ | 38 mm |
| Freq Min | — | 6 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz★ | 38 kHz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 120 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 110 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Codecs | QCY H3 ANC Bluetooth Headphones Over Ear, Active Noise Cancelling Bluetooth 5.4 Headphones with Microphones, Hi-Res Audio Sound, Multipoint Connection, 60H Playback, Custom EQ via App(White) | Sennheiser HD 560S Open-Back Over-Ear Wired Headphones - Neutral, Natural Sound for Music, Gaming, and Content Creation, Black |
| Surround | QCY H3 ANC Bluetooth Headphones Over Ear, Active Noise Cancelling Bluetooth 5.4 Headphones with Microphones, Hi-Res Audio Sound, Multipoint Connection, 60H Playback, Custom EQ via App(Blue) | QCY H3 A | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | ✗ |
| ANC Type | hybrid | — |
| Transparency | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Bluetooth | 5.4★ | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cable Length | — | 1.7999999523162842 m |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 60 hrs★ | — |
| Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Mic Count | 3★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Boom Mic | ✗ | ✗ |
| Detachable Mic | — | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Touch Controls | ✓★ | ✗ |
| App | QCY APP | — |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✓★ |
优缺点
QCY H3 ANC
- Strong connectivity (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong anc (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong battery (89th percentile)89th %ile
Sennheiser HD 560S
- Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong build (75th percentile)
- Strong sound (73rd percentile)
- Strong user sentiment (73rd percentile)
- Below average mic (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average affordability (25th percentile)
- Below average anc (33rd percentile)
价格
QCY H3 ANC1.762每美元得分
vs
Sennheiser HD 560S0.298每美元得分
QCY H3 ANC 性价比高 5.9 倍
结论
胜出: QCY H3 ANC
Scores 88 overall, wins 5 of 7 usage categories and 15 of 34 specs.
