JLab GO Tones+ EBGTONEPFA50WEB
JLab
63 综合评分
vs
Anker Space A40
Anker
85 综合评分
买家怎么说
JLab GO Tones+ EBGTONEPFA50WEB
85 满分 100 置信度中 26 条评价
这些耳机因其出色的性价比、舒适的佩戴感和令人印象深刻的音质而广受好评，尤其是考虑到其低廉的价格。许多用户喜欢肤色选项，使其在工作或学校中不显眼。一些反复出现的问题包括充电盒太容易打开、耳机对小耳朵来说有点大，以及麦克风质量和音量控制方面的问题。总体而言，它们被视为AirPods等高端品牌的绝佳平价替代品。
优点
- 出色的性价比
- 佩戴舒适
- 音质出色
- 电池续航长
- 不显眼的肤色
缺点
- 充电盒太容易打开
- 耳机对小耳朵来说可能太大
- 麦克风质量有待提高
- 耳机和设备之间的音量控制问题
- 蓝牙连接速度不是最快的
Value for money 12
Sound quality 18
Battery life 10
Comfort and fit 14
Skin tone colors 9
Build quality 6
Anker Space A40
85 满分 100 置信度低 9 条评价
Soundcore Space A40 耳机因其出色的音质、可通过应用程序自定义的均衡器以及强大的降噪功能而广受好评。用户赞赏其长续航、快速充电以及多种耳塞尺寸带来的舒适佩戴感。一些人指出，主动降噪效果不如更昂贵的竞品，并且在某些情况下蓝牙连接可能会中断。总体而言，性价比很高。
优点
- 出色的音质
- 可通过应用程序自定义均衡器
- 良好的降噪效果
- 长续航
- 快速充电
缺点
- 主动降噪不如高端竞品强劲
- 偶尔出现蓝牙连接中断
- 触控操作同时只能使用部分功能
- 电池续航略低于宣传
- 部分用户左耳不适
Sound quality 7
Noise cancellation 7
Battery life 6
Comfort and fit 5
Value for money 5
Bluetooth connectivity 3
评分
Budget
Travel
Gaming
Commute
Music
Calls
Fitness
规格
| JLab GO Tones+ EBGTONEPFA50WEB | Anker Space A40 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | Large, Medium, Small | 5 sizes of silicone ear tips |
| Weight | — | 0.06 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 6 mm | 11 mm★ |
| Drivers | 1 | 2★ |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 20 kHz | 20 kHz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Codecs | SBC | LDAC |
| Surround | — | Soundcore by Anker Space A40 Auto-Adjustable Active Noise Cancelling Wireless Earbuds, Reduce Noise by Up to 98%, 50H Playtime, Hi-Res Sound, App Customization, Wireless Charge (Renewed) Blue (Refresh |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2★ |
| Profiles | HSP, HFP, A2DP, AVRCP | — |
| Multipoint | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wired Connector | — | Bluetooth |
| Range | 9.100000381469727 m★ | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 9 hrs | 10 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | 2 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Fast Charging | 10 minutes = 1 hour | 10 min for 4 hours playback |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 34 hrs | 50 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 2 | 6★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Siri, Google | Siri, Google Assistant |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | JLab app | soundcore |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 | IPX4 |
优缺点
JLab GO Tones+ EBGTONEPFA50WEB
- Strong connectivity (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong battery (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong mic (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Below average sound (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average comfort (29th percentile)
Anker Space A40
- Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong sound (94th percentile)94th %ile
价格
JLab GO Tones+ EBGTONEPFA50WEB2.101每美元得分
vs
Anker Space A400.964每美元得分
JLab GO Tones+ EBGTONEPFA50WEB 性价比高 2.2 倍
结论
胜出: Anker Space A40
Scores 85 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 10 of 38 specs.
