Thermal Grizzly CSF-AM5
Thermal Grizzly
13 综合评分
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 6-core AM4
AMD
65 综合评分
买家怎么说
Thermal Grizzly CSF-AM5
暂无用户反馈
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 6-core AM4
62 满分 100 置信度中 12 条评价
Ryzen 5 1600 因其性能和性价比而受到称赞，但一条经过验证的评论抱怨缺少附带的散热器。问答回复确认该 CPU 没有集成显卡，需要独立 GPU，并且兼容 AM4 主板但不兼容 Intel 主板。整体情绪复杂，但由于强劲的性能和良好的原装散热器而偏向积极。
优点
- 性价比高
- 真正的6核12线程CPU
- 原装散热器不错
- 可使用原装散热器超频
- 兼容AM4主板
缺点
- 包装中缺少散热器
- 没有集成显卡
- 不兼容Intel主板
Performance 3
Value for money 2
Stock cooler 4
Integrated graphics 2
Motherboard compatibility 3
Overclocking 2
评分
Efficiency
Productivity
Budget
Gaming
Ai Llm
Server
规格
| Thermal Grizzly CSF-AM5 | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | AMD | AMD |
| Series | — | Ryzen 5 |
| Model | 000 | 1600 |
| Codename | — | Zen |
| Class | desktop | desktop |
| Process | — | 14★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | — | 6★ |
| P-cores | — | 6★ |
| Threads | — | 12★ |
| Base Clock | 无数据 | |
| Boost Clock | 无数据 | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | — | 3★ |
| L3 Cache | — | 16★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | 无数据 | |
| PassMark Single | 无数据 | |
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | — | DDR4★ |
| Max Speed | 无数据 | |
| Channels | — | 2★ |
| ECC | — | ✓★ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | AM5 | AM4 |
| PCIe | — | 3.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16★ |
| TDP | — | 65★ |
| Unlocked | — | ✓★ |
优缺点
Thermal Grizzly CSF-AM5
- Strong social proof (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Below average single thread (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average ai (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average multi thread (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average efficiency (4th percentile)4th %ile
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 6-core AM4
- Strong social proof (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong platform (75th percentile)
- Strong feature (75th percentile)
- Strong efficiency (75th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (9th percentile)9th %ile
价格
Thermal Grizzly CSF-AM50.484每美元得分
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 6-core AM40.293每美元得分
Thermal Grizzly CSF-AM5 性价比高 1.7 倍
结论
胜出: AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Scores 65 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 17 of 24 specs.
