Thermal Grizzly CSF-AM5
Thermal Grizzly
13 综合评分
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 8-core AM4
AMD
59 综合评分
买家怎么说
Thermal Grizzly CSF-AM5
暂无用户反馈
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 8-core AM4
62 满分 100 置信度中 29 条评价
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 在性能和价值方面表现出色，尤其是在多任务处理和内容创作方面，但用户体验褒贬不一。一些用户收到的 CPU 针脚弯曲或缺少宣传的散热器，导致退货和不满。虽然处理器安装后运行良好，但包装、配件缺失以及原装散热器高温的问题值得注意。
优点
- 性价比高
- 强大的多任务处理和内容创作
- 8核16线程
- 兼容AM4主板
- 附带Wraith Spire散热器
缺点
- 到货时针脚弯曲
- 部分订单缺少散热器
- 原装散热器温度高
- 无集成显卡
- 配送缓慢
Value for money 3
Performance 5
Cooler included 4
Build quality 2
Temperature 2
Delivery speed 2
评分
Efficiency
Productivity
Budget
Gaming
Ai Llm
Server
规格
| Thermal Grizzly CSF-AM5 | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | AMD | AMD |
| Series | — | Ryzen 7 |
| Model | 000 | 2700 |
| Codename | — | Pinnacle Ridge (Zen+) |
| Class | desktop | desktop |
| Process | — | 12★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | — | 8★ |
| P-cores | — | 8★ |
| Threads | — | 16★ |
| Base Clock | 无数据 | |
| Boost Clock | 无数据 | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | — | 4★ |
| L3 Cache | — | 16★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | 无数据 | |
| PassMark Single | 无数据 | |
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | — | DDR4★ |
| Max Speed | 无数据 | |
| Channels | — | 2★ |
| Max Memory | — | 64★ |
| ECC | — | ✗ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | AM5 | AM4 |
| PCIe | — | 3.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16★ |
| TDP | — | 65★ |
| Unlocked | — | ✓★ |
优缺点
Thermal Grizzly CSF-AM5
- Strong social proof (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Below average single thread (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average ai (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average multi thread (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average efficiency (4th percentile)4th %ile
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 8-core AM4
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong efficiency (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong multi thread (71st percentile)
- Strong platform (70th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (9th percentile)9th %ile
价格
Thermal Grizzly CSF-AM50.484每美元得分
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 8-core AM40.100每美元得分
Thermal Grizzly CSF-AM5 性价比高 4.8 倍
结论
胜出: AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Scores 59 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 17 of 25 specs.
