Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF 20-core Intel Socket 1851
Intel
96 综合评分
vs
Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 4-core AM4
be quiet!
40 综合评分
买家怎么说
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF 20-core Intel Socket 1851
88 满分 100 置信度中 14 条评价
从旧款英特尔芯片（如8700K或8600K）升级的用户报告称，在游戏和生产力方面有巨大提升，其中一人平均帧数增加了20帧。该CPU运行凉爽，尤其在打折时被认为物超所值。有人提到对于拥有近期英特尔代的用户来说不值得升级，还有用户警告安装时要小心，以免弯曲针脚。
优点
- 从旧芯片升级性能提升巨大
- 运行凉爽
- 打折时物超所值
- 游戏和生产力表现出色
- 新BIOS更新后稳定
缺点
- 从近期英特尔升级不值得
- 安装时有弯曲针脚的风险
- 需要新主板、内存、散热器
Performance boost from old chips 4
Value for money 3
Thermal performance 2
Upgrade worthiness 3
Installation difficulty 1
Gaming performance 3
Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 4-core AM4
暂无用户反馈
评分
Budget
Productivity
Ai Llm
Gaming
Efficiency
Server
规格
| Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF | Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | Intel | Intel |
| Series | Core Ultra 7 | Ryzen 3 |
| Model | 265KF | 1200 |
| Codename | Arrow Lake-S | Zen |
| Class | desktop | desktop |
| Process | 3★ | 14 |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 20★ | 4 |
| P-cores | 8★ | 4 |
| E-cores | 12★ | — |
| Threads | 20★ | 4 |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 36★ | 2 |
| L3 Cache | 30★ | 8 |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR5★ | DDR4 |
| Max Speed | ||
| Channels | 2★ | — |
| Max Memory | 无数据 | |
| ECC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | LGA1851 | AM4 |
| PCIe | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | 24★ | 16 |
| TDP | 125★ | 270 |
| Max Turbo Power | 250★ | — |
| Unlocked | ✓ | ✓ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | None | — |
| NPU TOPS | 13★ | — |
优缺点
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF 20-core Intel Socket 1851
- Strong single thread (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong feature (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong ai (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong efficiency (96th percentile)96th %ile
Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 4-core AM4
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Below average efficiency (33rd percentile)
结论
胜出: Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF
Scores 96 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 19 of 29 specs.