MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM5

MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM5

MSI
16 Загальна оцінка
vs
Intel Celeron G3900 2-core LGA1151

Intel Celeron G3900 2-core LGA1151

Intel
25 Загальна оцінка

Оцінки

Budget
MSI
22
Intel
50
Gaming
MSI
14
Intel
27
Productivity
MSI
15
Intel
23
Efficiency
MSI
11
Intel
21
Server
MSI
15
Intel
18
Ai Llm
MSI
14
Intel
17

Характеристики

MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFiIntel Celeron G3900
Processor
BrandAMDIntel
SeriesRyzen 9Celeron
Model9000G3900
Codename—Skylake
Classdesktopdesktop
Process—14★
Cores & Clocks
Cores—2★
Threads—2★
Base ClockНемає даних
2,800
Cache
L2 Cache—2★
L3 Cache—2★
Memory
Memory TypeDDR5★DDR4
Max Speed
8,400
2,133
Channels22
Max Memory
256
64
Platform & Power
SocketAM5LGA1151
PCIe5.0—
TDP—51★
Unlocked—✗
Graphics & AI
Integrated Graphics—Intel HD Graphics 510

Плюси та мінуси

MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM5

  • Strong platform (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average single thread (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average ai (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average multi thread (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average efficiency (4th percentile)4th %ile

Intel Celeron G3900 2-core LGA1151

  • Strong affordability (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong social proof (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong feature (70th percentile)
  • Below average multi thread (9th percentile)9th %ile
  • Below average ai (10th percentile)10th %ile
  • Below average efficiency (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average single thread (30th percentile)

Ціни

Intel Celeron G3900 2-core LGA1151 is 333 EUR cheaper (7.4x less).

MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM50.043балів за долар
vs
Intel Celeron G3900 2-core LGA11510.488балів за долар

Intel Celeron G3900 2-core LGA1151 пропонує у 11.3x краще співвідношення ціна-якість

MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM5

Intel Celeron G3900 2-core LGA1151

Вердикт

★ Переможець: Intel Celeron G3900

Scores 25 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 7 of 20 specs.

Intel Celeron G3900 Краще в:

Ai LlmBudgetGamingServerEfficiencyProductivity

Також варто розглянути