SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk
89 Общая оценка
vs
Kingston DC600M 960GB SATA III 2.5"

Kingston DC600M 960GB SATA III 2.5"

Kingston
53 Общая оценка

Оценки

Console
SanDisk
86
Kingston
19
Workstation
SanDisk
85
Kingston
55
Gaming
SanDisk
84
Kingston
40
Laptop
SanDisk
65
Kingston
47
Budget
SanDisk
57
Kingston
49
Portable
SanDisk
23
Kingston
12

Характеристики

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100Kingston DC600M
Drive
Capacity
8,000
960
Form FactorM.2 22802.5"
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x4SATA III
ProtocolNVMeSATA
PCIe Generation5★—
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
14,900
560
Sequential Write (MB/s)
13,200
Нет данных
Random Read (IOPS)
2,200,000
Нет данных
Random Write (IOPS)
2,400,000
Нет данных
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗✓★
ControllernCache 4.0—
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
4,800
1,752
MTBF (hours)
1,750,000
Нет данных
Warranty (years)55
Features
Heatsink✓★—
Hardware Encryption✓✓

Плюсы и минусы

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Below average affordability (2nd percentile)2nd %ile

Kingston DC600M 960GB SATA III 2.5"

  • Strong endurance (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong feature (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Below average affordability (10th percentile)10th %ile
  • Below average random (22nd percentile)
  • Below average speed (23rd percentile)

Вердикт

★ Победитель: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

Scores 89 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 18 specs.

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 Лучше в:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation