Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
44 Pontuação geral
vs
Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM 85mm

Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM 85mm

Canon
49 Pontuação geral

Pontuações

Portrait
Sigma
59
Canon
43
Budget
Sigma
56
Canon
53
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
39
Canon
54
Street
Sigma
46
Canon
51
Video Cinema
Sigma
47
Canon
42
Macro
Sigma
16
Canon
46
Professional
Sigma
42
Canon
43
Travel
Sigma
40
Canon
40
Landscape
Sigma
33
Canon
40

Especificações

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OSCanon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM 85mm
Optics
Typeprime
Focal Length Min16 mm85 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm85 mm
Elements9
Groups7
Aspherical Elements1
Coatingultra multi-coating (UMC)
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/22
Min Aperturef/1.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades8
Build
MountCanon EF
FormatFull-Frame
Weight0.42 kg
Filter Thread58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeUSM
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance853 mm
Max Magnification1:7.7

Prós e Contras

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM 85mm

  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Below average bokeh (19th percentile)19th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Veredito

Vencedor: Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM 85mm

Scores 49 overall, wins 4 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 19 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Melhor em:

BudgetPortraitVideo Cinema

Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM 85mm Melhor em:

MacroStreetLandscapeWildlife Sports