MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM5

MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM5

MSI
16 Pontuação geral
vs
Intel Core i9 14900 24-core LGA1700

Intel Core i9 14900 24-core LGA1700

Intel
90 Pontuação geral

Pontuações

Efficiency
MSI
11
Intel
99
Budget
MSI
18
Intel
96
Productivity
MSI
15
Intel
94
Ai Llm
MSI
14
Intel
87
Gaming
MSI
14
Intel
81
Server
MSI
15
Intel
81

Especificações

MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFiIntel Core i9 14900
Processor
BrandAMDIntel
SeriesRyzen 9Core i9
Model900014900
Codename—Raptor Lake
Classdesktopdesktop
Process—7★
Cores & Clocks
Cores—24★
P-cores—8★
E-cores—16★
Threads—32★
Base ClockSem dados
2,000
Boost ClockSem dados
5,800
Cache
L2 Cache—32★
L3 Cache—36★
Performance
PassMark MultiSem dados
44,853
PassMark SingleSem dados
4,334
Memory
Memory TypeDDR5DDR5
Max Speed
8,400
5,600
Channels22
Max Memory
256
192
ECC—✓★
Platform & Power
SocketAM5LGA 1700
PCIe5.05.0
PCIe Lanes—20★
TDP—65★
Max Turbo Power—219★
Unlocked—✗
Graphics & AI
Integrated Graphics—Intel UHD Graphics 770

Prós e Contras

MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM5

  • Strong platform (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average single thread (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average ai (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average multi thread (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average efficiency (4th percentile)4th %ile

Intel Core i9 14900 24-core LGA1700

  • Strong efficiency (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong single thread (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong platform (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong multi thread (92nd percentile)92nd %ile

Preços

MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM5 is € 453 cheaper (2.2x less).

MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM50.043pontos por dólar
vs
Intel Core i9 14900 24-core LGA17000.108pontos por dólar

Intel Core i9 14900 24-core LGA1700 oferece 2.5x melhor custo-benefício

MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM5

Intel Core i9 14900 24-core LGA1700

Veredito

★ Vencedor: Intel Core i9 14900

Scores 90 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 15 of 28 specs.

Intel Core i9 14900 Melhor em:

Ai LlmBudgetGamingServerEfficiencyProductivity

Considere também