AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7970X 32-core sTR5
AMD
81 Pontuação geral
vs
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
MICRO CENTER
66 Pontuação geral
Pontuações
Productivity
Server
Ai Llm
Efficiency
Gaming
Budget
Especificações
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7970X | MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | AMD | — |
| Series | Ryzen Threadripper | — |
| Model | 7970X | — |
| Codename | Storm Peak | — |
| Class | hedt | — |
| Process | 5★ | — |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 32★ | — |
| Threads | 64★ | — |
| Base Clock | Sem dados | |
| Boost Clock | Sem dados | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 32★ | — |
| L3 Cache | Sem dados | |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR5★ | — |
| Max Speed | Sem dados | |
| Channels | 4★ | — |
| Max Memory | Sem dados | |
| ECC | ✓★ | — |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | sTR5 | — |
| PCIe | 5.0 | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 92★ | — |
| TDP | 350★ | — |
| Max Turbo Power | 350★ | — |
| Unlocked | ✓★ | — |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | None Integrated Graphics | — |
Prós e Contras
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7970X 32-core sTR5
- Strong multi thread (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong ai (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong feature (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong platform (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Below average affordability (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average social proof (21st percentile)
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
- Strong single thread (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong multi thread (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong ai (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong efficiency (67th percentile)
- Below average affordability (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average platform (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average feature (21st percentile)
Preços
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7970X 32-core sTR50.038pontos por dólar
vs
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF0.025pontos por dólar
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7970X 32-core sTR5 oferece 1.5x melhor custo-benefício
Veredito
Vencedor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
Scores 81 overall, wins 3 of 6 usage categories and 17 of 26 specs.
