MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM5

MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM5

MSI
16 Totaalscore
vs
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 24-core LGA 1700

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 24-core LGA 1700

Intel
62 Totaalscore

Scores

Efficiency
MSI
11
Intel
70
Productivity
MSI
15
Intel
63
Ai Llm
MSI
14
Intel
60
Server
MSI
15
Intel
57
Budget
MSI
22
Intel
54
Gaming
MSI
14
Intel
53

Specificaties

MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFiIntel Core Ultra 9 285
Processor
BrandAMDIntel
SeriesRyzen 9Core Ultra 9
Model9000285
Codename—Zen
Classdesktopdesktop
Process—14★
Cores & Clocks
Cores—24★
P-cores—8★
E-cores—16★
Threads—24★
Base ClockGeen data
3,000
Boost ClockGeen data
5,600
Cache
L2 Cache—4★
L3 Cache—16★
Performance
PassMark MultiGeen data
14,751
PassMark SingleGeen data
1,997
Memory
Memory TypeDDR5DDR5
Max Speed
8,400
2,666
Channels2★—
Max Memory
256
Geen data
ECC—✓★
Platform & Power
SocketAM5LGA 1700
PCIe5.05.0
PCIe Lanes—16★
TDP—65★
Unlocked—✓★

Voor- & Nadelen

MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM5

  • Strong platform (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average single thread (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average ai (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average multi thread (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average efficiency (4th percentile)4th %ile

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 24-core LGA 1700

  • Strong platform (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong efficiency (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong feature (75th percentile)
  • Strong multi thread (69th percentile)
  • Below average affordability (13th percentile)13th %ile

Prijzen

MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM5 is € 248 cheaper (1.6x less).

MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM50.042score per dollar
vs
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 24-core LGA 17000.097score per dollar

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 24-core LGA 1700 biedt 2.3x betere prijs-kwaliteit

MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM5

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 24-core LGA 1700

Oordeel

★ Winnaar: Intel Core Ultra 9 285

Scores 62 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 15 of 26 specs.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 Beter in:

Ai LlmBudgetGamingServerEfficiencyProductivity

Overweeg ook