Kingston KF556C40BB-16
Kingston
64 종합 점수
vs
Transcend JetRam
Transcend
8 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Gaming
Workstation
Laptop
Server
사양
| Kingston KF556C40BB-16 | Transcend JetRam | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR5★ | — |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 1 | 1 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 240 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | 데이터 없음 | |
| CAS Latency | 40 | 5★ |
| Timings | 40-40-40 | 5-5-5 |
| Voltage | 1.25★ | 1.7999999523162842 |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | Intel XMP 3.0 | — |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | ✓★ | — |
장단점
Kingston KF556C40BB-16
- Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong speed (78th percentile)
- Below average latency (31st percentile)
Transcend JetRam
- Below average latency (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average speed (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average capacity (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average feature (18th percentile)18th %ile
가격
Kingston KF556C40BB-160.253달러당 점수
vs
Transcend JetRam0.586달러당 점수
Transcend JetRam 2.3배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Kingston KF556C40BB-16
Scores 64 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 6 of 15 specs.
