Team Group TTCED416G3600HC18JDC01
Team Group
64 종합 점수
vs
Crucial CP2K16G64C38U5B
Crucial
86 종합 점수
점수
Gaming
Budget
Workstation
Laptop
Server
사양
| Team Group TTCED416G3600HC18JDC01 | Crucial CP2K16G64C38U5B | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR4 | DDR5★ |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2 | 2 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 288 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 18★ | 38 |
| Timings | — | 38-40-40-84 |
| Voltage | — | 1.350000023841858★ |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | — | Intel XMP 3.0, AMD EXPO |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | ✓ | ✓ |
장단점
Team Group TTCED416G3600HC18JDC01
- Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
Crucial CP2K16G64C38U5B
- Strong speed (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong latency (77th percentile)
- Strong feature (73rd percentile)
가격
Team Group TTCED416G3600HC18JDC010.401달러당 점수
vs
Crucial CP2K16G64C38U5B0.166달러당 점수
Team Group TTCED416G3600HC18JDC01 2.4배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Crucial CP2K16G64C38U5B
Scores 86 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 5 of 15 specs.
