Team Group (CTCED532G6400HC32ADC01)
Team Group
84 종합 점수
vs
Crucial (CT2K8G4DFS824A)
Crucial
52 종합 점수
점수
Gaming
Budget
Workstation
Laptop
Server
사양
| Team Group | Crucial | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR5★ | DDR4 |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2 | 2 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 288 |
| Rank | 1Rx8 | 1Rx8 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 32 | 17★ |
| Timings | 32-39-39-84 | 11-11-11-36 |
| Voltage | 1.350000023841858 | 1.2000000476837158★ |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | Intel XMP 3.0 | Intel XMP 2.0 |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | ✓★ | — |
장단점
Team Group (CTCED532G6400HC32ADC01)
- Strong speed (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong feature (75th percentile)
- Below average affordability (24th percentile)
Crucial (CT2K8G4DFS824A)
- Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong feature (65th percentile)
- Below average speed (29th percentile)
가격
Team Group (CTCED532G6400HC32ADC01)0.119달러당 점수
vs
Crucial (CT2K8G4DFS824A)0.351달러당 점수
Crucial (CT2K8G4DFS824A) 2.9배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Team Group
Scores 84 overall, wins 4 of 5 usage categories and 5 of 16 specs.
