Kingston FURY Beast
Kingston
91 종합 점수
vs
Team Group (CTCED532G6400HC32ADC01)
Team Group
89 종합 점수
점수
Workstation
Gaming
Budget
Laptop
Server
사양
| Kingston FURY Beast | Team Group | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2 | 2 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 288 |
| Rank | 2Rx8 | 1Rx8 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 30★ | 32 |
| Timings | 30-36-36 | 32-39-39-84 |
| Voltage | 1.399999976158142 | 1.350000023841858★ |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | Intel XMP 3.0, AMD EXPO | Intel XMP 3.0 |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | ✓ | ✓ |
장단점
Kingston FURY Beast
- Strong capacity (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong speed (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Below average affordability (8th percentile)8th %ile
Team Group (CTCED532G6400HC32ADC01)
- Strong speed (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong user sentiment (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Below average affordability (23rd percentile)
가격
Kingston FURY Beast0.063달러당 점수
vs
Team Group (CTCED532G6400HC32ADC01)0.126달러당 점수
Team Group (CTCED532G6400HC32ADC01) 2.0배 더 나은 가성비
결론
무승부
Both products are closely matched - Kingston FURY Beast wins 3 specs while Team Group wins 2.
