BLAZAR LENS Beetle 65mm T3.2 1.33x Full-Frame Anamorphic 65mm

BLAZAR LENS Beetle 65mm T3.2 1.33x Full-Frame Anamorphic 65mm

BLAZAR LENS
44 종합 점수
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
98 종합 점수

점수

Macro
BLAZAR LENS
42
Sigma
100
Landscape
BLAZAR LENS
24
Sigma
100
Budget
BLAZAR LENS
41
Sigma
99
Travel
BLAZAR LENS
34
Sigma
93
Video Cinema
BLAZAR LENS
44
Sigma
90
Wildlife Sports
BLAZAR LENS
35
Sigma
87
Portrait
BLAZAR LENS
49
Sigma
85
Professional
BLAZAR LENS
36
Sigma
84
Street
BLAZAR LENS
53
Sigma
80

사양

BLAZAR LENS Beetle 65mm T3.2 1.33x Full-Frame Anamorphic 65mmSigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Optics
Type—zoom
Focal Length Min65 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max65 mm300 mm
Elements—20
Groups—14
Aspherical Elements—4★
ED Elements—5★
Coating—water- and oil-repellent coating
Aperture
Max Aperture—f/3.5
Min Aperture—3.5-6.7
Constant—✗
Diaphragm Blades—9★
Build
MountL-MountSony E
FormatFull-Frame (36 x 24 mm Sensor)★APS-C
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.29 kg★0.61 kg
Filter Thread55 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Type—HLA
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—6 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance460 mm170 mm★
Max Magnification—1:2★

장단점

BLAZAR LENS Beetle 65mm T3.2 1.33x Full-Frame Anamorphic 65mm

  • Strong build (76th percentile)
  • Strong aperture (66th percentile)
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong macro (88th percentile)88th %ile

결론

★ 승자: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Scores 98 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS 더 나은 점:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports