Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
43 종합 점수
vs
Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Canon
86 종합 점수

점수

Macro
Sigma
17
Canon
95
Video Cinema
Sigma
47
Canon
82
Budget
Sigma
56
Canon
79
Landscape
Sigma
31
Canon
79
Travel
Sigma
38
Canon
78
Professional
Sigma
39
Canon
77
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
36
Canon
75
Street
Sigma
45
Canon
66
Portrait
Sigma
55
Canon
49

사양

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OSCanon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM
Optics
Type—zoom
Focal Length Min16 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm70 mm
Elements—15
Groups—12
Aspherical Elements—2★
ED Elements—2★
Coating—Super Spectra Coating (SSC)
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/22
Min Aperture—f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades—9★
Build
Mount—Canon RF
Format—full-frame★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight—0.49 kg★
Filter Thread—67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Type—STM★
Stabilization—✓★
Stabilization Stops—5.5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance—239 mm★
Max Magnification—1:4.2★

장단점

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)
  • Below average build (32nd percentile)

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)

결론

★ 승자: Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Scores 86 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 11 of 22 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS 더 나은 점:

Portrait

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM 더 나은 점:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports