VENUS-LAOWA VE2528NZ
VENUS-LAOWA
39 종합 점수
vs
Zeiss Batis 000000-2136-695 135mm
Zeiss
72 종합 점수
점수
Portrait
Professional
Video Cinema
Budget
Street
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Travel
Macro
사양
| VENUS-LAOWA VE2528NZ | Zeiss Batis 000000-2136-695 135mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | telephoto |
| Focal Length Min | 25 mm | 135 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 25 mm | 135 mm |
| Elements | — | 14 |
| Groups | — | 11 |
| Coating | — | ZEISS T* coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | — | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | — | ✓★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Sony E |
| Format | — | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.40 kg★ | 0.61 kg |
| Filter Thread | — | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | — | ✓★ |
장단점
VENUS-LAOWA VE2528NZ
- Strong aperture (67th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (65th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Zeiss Batis 000000-2136-695 135mm
- Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong aperture (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong bokeh (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
가격
VENUS-LAOWA VE2528NZ0.085달러당 점수
vs
Zeiss Batis 000000-2136-695 135mm0.050달러당 점수
VENUS-LAOWA VE2528NZ 1.7배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Zeiss Batis 000000-2136-695 135mm
Scores 72 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 16 specs.
