Zeiss Milvus 18mm f/2.8 ZE 18mm
Zeiss
32 종합 점수
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 종합 점수
점수
Macro
Portrait
Budget
Professional
Video Cinema
Landscape
Street
Travel
Wildlife Sports
사양
| Zeiss Milvus 18mm f/2.8 ZE 18mm | Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | — |
| Focal Length Min | 18 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 18 mm | 300 mm |
| Elements | 14 | — |
| Groups | 12 | — |
| Aspherical Elements | 2★ | — |
| ED Elements | 4★ | — |
| Coating | ZEISS T anti-reflective coating | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | — |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon EF | — |
| Format | full-frame★ | — |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.72 kg★ | — |
| Filter Thread | 77 mm | — |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | — |
| Stabilization | ✗ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 250 mm★ | — |
| Max Magnification | 1:7★ | — |
장단점
Zeiss Milvus 18mm f/2.8 ZE 18mm
- Strong optical (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong macro (78th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
결론
승자: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Scores 44 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 0 of 20 specs.