Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 종합 점수
vs
Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM
Canon
61 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Landscape
Street
Travel
Portrait
Wildlife Sports
Professional
Macro
Video Cinema
사양
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 10 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 22 mm |
| Elements | — | 13 |
| Groups | — | 10 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 1★ |
| Coating | — | Super Spectra coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | 22-27★ |
| Min Aperture | — | 3.5-4.5 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 6★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Canon EF-S |
| Format | — | APS-C★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✗ |
| Weight | — | 0.39 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 77 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | USM★ |
| Stabilization | — | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 240 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.17x★ |
장단점
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM
- Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong optical (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Strong versatility (75th percentile)
- Below average bokeh (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
가격
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
No current pricing available
Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM
결론
승자: Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM
Scores 61 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.
