Viltrox Air AF 9mm f/2.8 9mm
Viltrox
60 종합 점수
vs
TTArtisan AF 35mm f/1.8 II 35mm
TTArtisan
52 종합 점수
점수
Macro
Street
Budget
Travel
Portrait
Professional
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
사양
| Viltrox Air AF 9mm f/2.8 9mm | TTArtisan AF 35mm f/1.8 II 35mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | wide-angle | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 9 mm | 35 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 9 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | 5 | 10 |
| Groups | 4 | 7 |
| ED Elements | — | 2★ |
| Coating | advanced nano-coating | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/9 | f/16 |
| Min Aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Constant | — | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Fujifilm X | Fujifilm X |
| Format | — | APS-C★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✗ |
| Weight | 0.13 kg★ | 0.18 kg |
| Filter Thread | 49 mm | 52 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 14 mm★ | 399 mm |
장단점
Viltrox Air AF 9mm f/2.8 9mm
- Strong macro (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Below average optical (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
TTArtisan AF 35mm f/1.8 II 35mm
- Strong build (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (21st percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
가격
Viltrox Air AF 9mm f/2.8 9mm0.261달러당 점수
vs
TTArtisan AF 35mm f/1.8 II 35mm0.363달러당 점수
TTArtisan AF 35mm f/1.8 II 35mm 1.4배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Viltrox Air AF 9mm f/2.8 9mm
Scores 60 overall, wins 1 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 19 specs.
