JBL Tune 670NC
JBL
92 종합 점수
vs
Yamaha HPH-150WH
Yamaha
43 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Commute
Gaming
Work
Music
Studio
Calls
사양
| JBL Tune 670NC | Yamaha HPH-150WH | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | on-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | open |
| Foldable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.17 kg | 0.16 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | soft ear cushions | velour |
| Headband | padded headband | — |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 32 mm | 40 mm★ |
| Drivers | 1★ | — |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 20 kHz | 20 kHz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 48 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 98 dB | 101 dB★ |
| Max SPL | 95 dB★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✗ | — |
| Codecs | SBC, AAC, LC3 | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | ✗ |
| ANC Type | adaptive | — |
| Transparency | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | — |
| Profiles | A2DP 1.4, AVRCP, HFP 1.8 | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | — |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cable Length | 1.2192000150680542 m | 2 m |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 70 hrs★ | — |
| Charge Time | 2 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 5min=3hrs | — |
| Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Capacity | 690 mAh★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓★ | — |
| Mic Count | 1★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓★ | — |
| Boom Mic | ✗ | — |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | voice assistant | — |
| Touch Controls | ✗ | — |
| App | JBL Headphones | — |
| Gaming Mode | ✓★ | — |
장단점
JBL Tune 670NC
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong battery (95th percentile)95th %ile
Yamaha HPH-150WH
- Strong comfort (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong build (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Strong sound (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Below average social proof (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average mic (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average anc (33rd percentile)
가격
JBL Tune 670NC1.196달러당 점수
vs
Yamaha HPH-150WH0.447달러당 점수
JBL Tune 670NC 2.7배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: JBL Tune 670NC
Scores 92 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 15 of 39 specs.
