JBL Tune 780NC
JBL
86 종합 점수
vs
Behringer HPM1100U
Behringer
34 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Gaming
Work
Music
Commute
Calls
Studio
사양
| JBL Tune 780NC | Behringer HPM1100U | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | on-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | closed |
| Foldable | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.23 kg★ | — |
| Ear Cushion | soft over-ear cups | — |
| Headband | fabric | — |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 40 mm | 40 mm |
| Drivers | 1★ | — |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 20 kHz | 20 kHz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 80 dB | 96 dB★ |
| Max SPL | 93 dB★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | — |
| ANC Type | adaptive | — |
| Transparency | ✓★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | — |
| Profiles | A2DP, AVRCP, HFP | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | — |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | USB-C |
| Detachable Cable | ✓★ | — |
| Cable Length | 1.2000000476837158 m | 2 m |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 50 hrs★ | — |
| Charge Time | 2 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 5min=4hrs | — |
| Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Capacity | 690 mAh★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 2★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓★ | — |
| Boom Mic | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Detachable Mic | ✗ | — |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Alexa, Google Assistant | — |
| Touch Controls | ✗ | — |
| App | JBL Headphones | — |
| Volume Limiting | ✗ | — |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | — |
장단점
JBL Tune 780NC
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong battery (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
Behringer HPM1100U
- Strong sound (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Strong mic (78th percentile)
- Below average social proof (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average connectivity (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average comfort (29th percentile)
- Below average anc (30th percentile)
가격
JBL Tune 780NC0.503달러당 점수
vs
Behringer HPM1100U2.289달러당 점수
Behringer HPM1100U 4.6배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: JBL Tune 780NC
Scores 86 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 16 of 40 specs.
