HiFiGo Binary EP321
HiFiGo
35 종합 점수
vs
ASUS ROG Cetra R55ES ROG CETRA TWS SPEEDNOVA
ASUS
44 종합 점수
점수
Gaming
Budget
Music
Fitness
Calls
Commute
Travel
사양
| HiFiGo Binary EP321 | ASUS ROG Cetra R55ES ROG CETRA TWS SPEEDNOVA | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | — | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | XS, S, M, L | — |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | hybrid | — |
| Driver Size | 10 mm★ | — |
| Drivers | 6★ | — |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz★ | — |
| Impedance | 13 Ω | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | HiFiGo Binary EP321 MEMS in-Ear Monitor, Direct-Drive MEMS Earphones, 3BA +2DD+1MEMS Hybrid IEM with Iridescent CNC Stainless Steel Faceplates for Musician Audiophile (3.5mm) | SBC, AAC |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | — | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.0★ |
| Multipoint | — | ✗ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✗ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Features | ||
| Touch Controls | — | ✓★ |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✓★ |
| Bone Conduction | — | ✓★ |
| Water Resistance | — | Water-Resistant |
장단점
HiFiGo Binary EP321
- Strong sound (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Below average comfort (28th percentile)
- Below average social proof (31st percentile)
- Below average anc (32nd percentile)
- Below average build (35th percentile)
ASUS ROG Cetra R55ES ROG CETRA TWS SPEEDNOVA
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong sound (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong build (72nd percentile)
- Strong mic (70th percentile)
- Below average battery (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average social proof (26th percentile)
- Below average comfort (28th percentile)
가격
HiFiGo Binary EP3210.103달러당 점수
vs
ASUS ROG Cetra R55ES ROG CETRA TWS SPEEDNOVA0.136달러당 점수
ASUS ROG Cetra R55ES ROG CETRA TWS SPEEDNOVA 1.3배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: ASUS ROG Cetra R55ES ROG CETRA TWS SPEEDNOVA
Scores 44 overall, wins 5 of 7 usage categories and 9 of 26 specs.
