DRQQ AirBuds 2
DRQQ
58 종합 점수
vs
JBL Live Beam JBLLIVEBEAM3SILAM
JBL
87 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Fitness
Travel
Calls
Gaming
Commute
Music
사양
| DRQQ AirBuds 2 | JBL Live Beam JBLLIVEBEAM3SILAM | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | l | S, M, L |
| Weight | 0.07 kg★ | 0.08 kg |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 10 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 40 kHz★ |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 100 dB★ |
| Max SPL | — | 96 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | AAC, SBC | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3★ |
| Profiles | — | A2DP 1.4, AVRCP, HFP 1.8 |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | Bluetooth | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 5 hrs | 12 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | 0.8299999833106995 hrs★ | 2 hrs |
| Fast Charging | — | 10 Minutes for 4 Hours |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 30 hrs | 36 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✓ | ✓ |
| Capacity | — | 68 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | — | 6★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Siri | Google Assistant |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | — | JBL Headphones |
| Bone Conduction | — | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IPX5 | IP55 |
장단점
DRQQ AirBuds 2
- Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong sound (77th percentile)
- Strong anc (74th percentile)
- Strong comfort (72nd percentile)
- Below average battery (21st percentile)
JBL Live Beam JBLLIVEBEAM3SILAM
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong connectivity (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
가격
DRQQ AirBuds 20.885달러당 점수
vs
JBL Live Beam JBLLIVEBEAM3SILAM0.282달러당 점수
DRQQ AirBuds 2 3.1배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: JBL Live Beam JBLLIVEBEAM3SILAM
Scores 87 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 14 of 38 specs.
