Thermal Grizzly 000 AM5
Thermal Grizzly
13 종합 점수
vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6132 LGA 3647
Intel
63 종합 점수
점수
Productivity
Server
Ai Llm
Budget
Efficiency
Gaming
사양
| Thermal Grizzly 000 | Intel Xeon Gold 6132 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | AMD | Intel |
| Series | — | Xeon Gold |
| Model | 000 | 6132 |
| Codename | — | Milan |
| Class | desktop | server |
| Process | — | 7★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | — | 16★ |
| P-cores | — | 16★ |
| Threads | — | 32★ |
| Base Clock | 데이터 없음 | |
| Boost Clock | 데이터 없음 | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | — | 6★ |
| L3 Cache | — | 64★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | 데이터 없음 | |
| PassMark Single | 데이터 없음 | |
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | — | DDR4★ |
| Max Speed | 데이터 없음 | |
| ECC | — | ✓★ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | AM5 | LGA 3647 |
| PCIe | — | 4.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | 데이터 없음 | |
| TDP | — | 140★ |
| Max Turbo Power | — | 150★ |
| Unlocked | — | ✗ |
장단점
Thermal Grizzly 000 AM5
- Strong affordability (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Below average single thread (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average ai (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average multi thread (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average efficiency (4th percentile)4th %ile
Intel Xeon Gold 6132 LGA 3647
- Strong ai (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong platform (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong multi thread (78th percentile)
- Strong efficiency (72nd percentile)
- Below average affordability (33rd percentile)
가격
Thermal Grizzly 000 AM50.516달러당 점수
vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6132 LGA 36470.165달러당 점수
Thermal Grizzly 000 AM5 3.1배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Intel Xeon Gold 6132
Scores 63 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 16 of 24 specs.
