SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
SanDisk
89 総合スコア
vs
Netac NV3000 250GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
Netac
50 総合スコア
スコア
Console
Workstation
Gaming
Budget
Laptop
Portable
スペック
| SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 | Netac NV3000 | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x4 |
| Protocol | NVMe | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 5★ | 3 |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Random Read (IOPS) | データなし | |
| Random Write (IOPS) | データなし | |
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | TLC | TLC |
| DRAM Cache | ✗ | — |
| Controller | nCache 4.0 | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | ||
| MTBF (hours) | データなし | |
| Warranty (years) | 5★ | — |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | ✓ | ✓ |
| Hardware Encryption | ✓★ | — |
長所と短所
SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong feature (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Below average affordability (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
Netac NV3000 250GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong endurance (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong affordability (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong feature (79th percentile)
- Below average capacity (13th percentile)13th %ile
結論
勝者: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100
Scores 89 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 18 specs.