FiiO JT3
FiiO
45 総合スコア
vs
JBL Tune 770NC
JBL
86 総合スコア
スコア
Budget
Commute
Work
Music
Gaming
Calls
Studio
スペック
| FiiO JT3 | JBL Tune 770NC | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | open | closed |
| Foldable | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.77 kg | 0.23 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | velvet with memory foam | — |
| Headband | Aluminum-Magnesium Alloy | Plastic |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 50 mm★ | 40 mm |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 20 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 80 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 100 dB★ |
| Codecs | Open-Back Acoustic Design, Angled Driver Placement | JBL Tune 770NC - Adaptive Noise Cancelling with Smart Ambient Wireless Over-Ear Headphones, Bluetooth 5.3, Up to 70H Battery Life with Speed Charge, Lightweight, Comfortable & Foldable Design (Black) |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3★ |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 70 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 5min=3hrs |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Boom Mic | ✗ | ✗ |
| Detachable Mic | ✗ | — |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, Siri |
| Touch Controls | — | ✗ |
| App | — | JBL Headphones |
| Gaming Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Water Resistance | Water-Resistant | Water-Resistant |
長所と短所
FiiO JT3
- Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong sound (82th percentile)82th %ile
- Below average comfort (10th percentile)10th %ile
- Below average anc (30th percentile)
JBL Tune 770NC
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong battery (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Strong build (92th percentile)92th %ile
価格
FiiO JT30.561ドルあたりのスコア
vs
JBL Tune 770NC0.720ドルあたりのスコア
JBL Tune 770NC 1.3倍のコストパフォーマンス
結論
勝者: JBL Tune 770NC
Scores 86 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 14 of 34 specs.
