Sony FE 24-240mm f/3.5-6.3 OSS

Sony FE 24-240mm f/3.5-6.3 OSS

Sony
66 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R2060 20-60mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R2060 20-60mm

Panasonic
85 Punteggio complessivo

Punteggi

Wildlife Sports
Sony
88
Panasonic
78
Budget
Sony
81
Panasonic
86
Portrait
Sony
50
Panasonic
85
Landscape
Sony
85
Panasonic
75
Street
Sony
64
Panasonic
84
Professional
Sony
70
Panasonic
81
Travel
Sony
78
Panasonic
78
Macro
Sony
60
Panasonic
72
Video Cinema
Sony
71
Panasonic
71

Specifiche

Sony FE 24-240mm f/3.5-6.3 OSSPanasonic LUMIX S S-R2060 20-60mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min24 mm20 mm
Focal Length Max240 mm60 mm
Elements1711
Groups129
Aspherical Elements52
ED Elements13
CoatingT*Fluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperture22-40f/3.5
Min Aperture3.5-6.33.5-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades79
Build
MountSony EL-Mount
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.78 kg0.35 kg
Filter Thread72 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeLinear motorstepping motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance500 mm150 mm
Max Magnification0.27x0.43x

Pro e Contro

Sony FE 24-240mm f/3.5-6.3 OSS

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (7th percentile)7th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R2060 20-60mm

  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong build (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (81st percentile)81st %ile

Prezzi

Sony FE 24-240mm f/3.5-6.3 OSS

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R2060 20-60mm

No current pricing available

Verdetto

Vincitore: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R2060 20-60mm

Scores 85 overall, wins 5 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.

Sony FE 24-240mm f/3.5-6.3 OSS Migliore per:

LandscapeWildlife Sports

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R2060 20-60mm Migliore per:

MacroBudgetStreetPortraitProfessional

Da considerare anche