AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX 64-core WRX80

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX 64-core WRX80

AMD
75 Punteggio complessivo
vs
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

MICRO CENTER
66 Punteggio complessivo

Punteggi

Productivity
AMD
87
MICRO CENTER
74
Server
AMD
76
MICRO CENTER
53
Ai Llm
AMD
72
MICRO CENTER
56
Efficiency
AMD
47
MICRO CENTER
64
Gaming
AMD
47
MICRO CENTER
61
Budget
AMD
39
MICRO CENTER
59

Specifiche

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WXMICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
Processor
BrandAMD—
SeriesRyzen Threadripper—
Model5995WX—
CodenameZen 3—
Classhedt—
Cores & Clocks
Cores64★—
Threads
128
Dati non disponibili
Boost Clock
4,500
Dati non disponibili
Cache
L3 Cache
288
Dati non disponibili
Performance
PassMark Multi
94,761
70,110
PassMark Single
3,217
4,737
Memory
Memory TypeDDR4★—
Max Speed
3,200
Dati non disponibili
Platform & Power
SocketWRX80—
PCIe4.0—
PCIe Lanes
128
Dati non disponibili
Unlocked✗—

Pro e Contro

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX 64-core WRX80

  • Strong multi thread (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong ai (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong single thread (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong platform (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average affordability (2nd percentile)2nd %ile

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

  • Strong single thread (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong multi thread (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong ai (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong efficiency (66th percentile)
  • Below average affordability (7th percentile)7th %ile
  • Below average platform (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average feature (20th percentile)20th %ile

Prezzi

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF is 732 € cheaper (1.3x less).

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX 64-core WRX80

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

Verdetto

★ Vincitore: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

Scores 75 overall, wins 3 of 6 usage categories and 8 of 17 specs.

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Migliore per:

Ai LlmServerProductivity

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF Migliore per:

BudgetGamingEfficiency

Da considerare anche