Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
44 Puntuación general
vs
Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L 17mm

Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L 17mm

Canon
44 Puntuación general

Puntuaciones

Portrait
Sigma
59
Canon
34
Budget
Sigma
56
Canon
36
Landscape
Sigma
33
Canon
55
Professional
Sigma
42
Canon
49
Video Cinema
Sigma
47
Canon
36
Street
Sigma
46
Canon
35
Macro
Sigma
16
Canon
45
Travel
Sigma
40
Canon
36
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
39
Canon
33

Especificaciones

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OSCanon TS-E 17mm f/4L 17mm
Optics
Typetilt-shift
Focal Length Min16 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm17 mm
Elements18
Groups12
Aspherical Elements1
ED Elements4
CoatingSubwavelength Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/22
Min Aperturef/4
Constant
Diaphragm Blades8
Build
MountCanon EF
Formatfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.82 kg
Filter Thread77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus only
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm
Max Magnification0.14x

Pros y Contras

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L 17mm

  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong social proof (72nd percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (19th percentile)19th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Veredicto

Ganador: Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L 17mm

Scores 44 overall, wins 3 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Mejor en:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L 17mm Mejor en:

MacroLandscapeProfessional