Sigma 18-125mm f/3.8-5.6 AF DC OS HSM 125mm

Sigma 18-125mm f/3.8-5.6 AF DC OS HSM 125mm

Sigma
68 Puntuación general
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Puntuación general

Puntuaciones

Professional
Sigma
59
Nikon
95
Portrait
Sigma
72
Nikon
89
Street
Sigma
66
Nikon
86
Budget
Sigma
71
Nikon
86
Macro
Sigma
67
Nikon
85
Landscape
Sigma
60
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
Sigma
63
Nikon
83
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
58
Nikon
78
Travel
Sigma
61
Nikon
75

Especificaciones

Sigma 18-125mm f/3.8-5.6 AF DC OS HSM 125mmNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typetelephotozoom
Focal Length Min18 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max125 mm28 mm
Elements13
Groups11
Aspherical Elements33
ED Elements13
Coatingsuper multi-layer coatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.8f/2.8
Min Aperture3.8-5.6f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountCanon EFNikon Z
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.49 kg0.45 kg
Filter Thread67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeHSMStepping Motor
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance350 mm190 mm
Max Magnification1:3.81:5.26

Pros y Contras

Sigma 18-125mm f/3.8-5.6 AF DC OS HSM 125mm

  • Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong aperture (76th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (74th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Veredicto

Ganador: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Mejor en:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports