Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 2025

Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 2025

Xiaomi
78 Overall Score
vs
ICONLINK 10.1" CP31M Pink 2025

ICONLINK 10.1" CP31M Pink 2025

ICONLINK
49 Overall Score

Scores

Entertainment
Xiaomi
82
ICONLINK
51
Art Design
Xiaomi
80
ICONLINK
39
Reading
Xiaomi
79
ICONLINK
52
Productivity
Xiaomi
71
ICONLINK
32
Student
Xiaomi
69
ICONLINK
45
Business
Xiaomi
62
ICONLINK
38

Specifications

Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779ICONLINK 10.1" CP31M
Processor
CPU3 GHzUnisoc
Cores84
Memory & Storage
RAM12 GB20 GB
Storage512 GB128 GB
Expandable
Display
Size11.2"10.1"
Resolution3200 px
PanelLCDIPS
Refresh Rate144 Hz
Brightness800 nits
Connectivity
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6E
BluetoothBluetooth 5.4
USB-C11
Cellular
Features
Stylus Support
Fingerprint Reader
Physical
Weight0.45 kg0.97 kg
OSHyperOS 2Android 15

Pros & Cons

Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 2025

  • Strong screen (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong cpu (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong gpu (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong storage (90th percentile)90th %ile

ICONLINK 10.1" CP31M Pink 2025

  • Strong ram (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong social proof (72nd percentile)
  • Strong battery (66th percentile)
  • Below average feature (34th percentile)

Pricing

ICONLINK 10.1" CP31M Pink 2025 is €445 cheaper (4.3x less).

Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 20250.135score per dollar
vs
ICONLINK 10.1" CP31M Pink 20250.360score per dollar

ICONLINK 10.1" CP31M Pink 2025 offers 2.7x better value for money

Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 2025

ICONLINK 10.1" CP31M Pink 2025

Verdict

Winner: Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779

Scores 78 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 18 specs.

Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Better at:

ReadingStudentBusinessArt DesignProductivityEntertainment

Also Consider